《辨法法性論》研究 第3卷（全2冊）

Acknowledgment
Preface
Introduction to the Dharmadharmatavibhahga
1. What is the purpose of the
Dharmadharmatdvibhahga?
Summary of Blo bzang rta dbyangs’’s conflict
with Rong ston
The topic of ”characteristics” in Madhyantavibhdga
Some authors’’ statements of a text’’s purpose
Santaraksita’’s statement of purpose in his
Tattvasahgraha according to Kamalasila
Nagajuna’’s statement of purpose in his
Mulamadhyamakakdrikd according to
Candrakirti in his Prasannapadd
Dharmakirti’’s statement of purpose in his
Nydyabindu according to Dharmottara and
Vinitadeva
Is it the pair dharma and dharmata (as Blo bzang rta
dbyangs asserts) or the pair samsara and nirvana (as
Rong ston and Mi pham assert) that verse 1 teaches
are respectively to be abandoned and manifest
2. Manufacturing an illusion rather than seeing reality
3. Reality is to be known through the progressive
elimination of error (which means the yogin is to
stop, as per Dharmadharmatavibhangakarika 19,
originating the view of duality since duality,
being unoriginated, is present in error; he should
instead attune to the thusness of the three buddhistic
bodies)
4. Dharmadharmatavibhangakarika 6-7:
Appearance of nonexistent duality is the cause of
delusion-affliction
5. Dharmadharmatavibhahga and Gilbert Ryle:
Their attack on ”imputed objects of consciousness
and introspection”
6. Superseding appearances as subject and object
7. A brief note on the dGe lugs interpretation of
Maitreyan Yogacara: Is it designed to attack
Dol po pa?
Rong ston’’s commentary on the
Dharmadharmatavib hatigakarika
Schematic of contents of Rong ston’’s commentary
The Great Drum of the Gods that is Excellently
Teaching: An Explanation of The Discrimination of
Thematic Reality and Reality-itself [of Maitreya]
Mi pham’’s commentary on the
D harmadharmatavibhang akarika
The topics comprising Mi pham’’s commentary
Discerning Primordial Awareness and Appearance:
A commentary on The Verses of The Discerning of
Thematic Meaning and Reality-itself
Mi pham’’s commentary to Bodhicaryavatara
9:15c-29 (Santideva’’s refutation of the mentalists
(rnam rig smra ba rnams, Skt. vijntaptivadin))
Part One: The refutation of the mentalist theory
that perceptual forms are veridical
Part Two: Refutation of the mentalist theory
that perceptual forms are delusive
Mi pham’’s commentary on the Thirty Verses
(Trimsika)
Introduction
Dharmadharmatavibhanga and Trimsika
Content of Mi pham’’s commentary on Trimsika
The contents of Mi pham’’s commentary:
Schematic showing the main topics of the Trimsika
according to verses
Translation of Mipham’’s commentary to the
Trimsikakarika (The Thirty Verses)
Supplement to Mi pham’’s commentary to verse 19:
Sthiramati’’s commentary on Trimsika 19 (the all-
ground awareness and the proof of its existence)

Bibliography
Index
Chinese abstract